Legal Opinion

H. & M. Tire Service Co. v. Combs

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1934No. 31,560PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

The question for determination is the liability of the clerk of the district court under proceedings in garnishment.

In a divorce action the defendant, Zelta L. Combs, was awarded an auto truck. It was destroyed by fire, and in a suit brought to recover insurance on it the insurance company filed an answer alleging the husband claimed the truck, and he made a 'claim to the insurance moneys which had been paid into court on May 8, .1933. *36On May 18, 1933, a judgment was rendered in favor of Zelta L. Combs, and the money, less certain fees and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farnsworth v. BellTennessee Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Johnson v. BrantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  3. Phelps v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. InglittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stephens College v. LongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Welch v. Fiber Glass Engineering, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Mannel v. MannelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  4. Grimes v. FotiadesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Titus v. VansickleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API