Legal Opinion
Laverpool v. New York City Transit Authority
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 30, 1991No. CV-90-2327 (ADS)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, all former employees of the New York City Transit Authority (“TA”), challenge the TA’s drug testing requirements, methodology and policy, and also its disciplinary procedures as discrimi-natorily directed against minorities. The Amended Complaint alleges six causes of action throughout this sixty-nine page pleading with 323 numbered paragraphs, and the plaintiffs refer to alleged violations of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 and 1985; Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5; the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- GEOMC Co., Ltd. v. Calmare Therapeutics Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Dove v. Fordham UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Morpurgo v. Incorporated Village of Sag HarborDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Wine Markets International Inc. v. BassDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- R.C.M. Executive Gallery Corp. v. Rols Capital Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.