Legal Opinion

Texas Pipe Line Co. v. Huddleston

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 27, 1925No. 7371PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The matter in controversy is a doctor’s bill amounting to about $100, incurred in the year 1917. This is the second appeal growing out of the litigation. Huddleston v. Pipe Line Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 230 S. W. 250.

An employee of the Pipe Line Company was badly scalded at the company’s pumping station near the village of Newark, north of the city of Port Worth. The company’s engineer, in charge of the employees .at the pumping station, called Dr. Huddleston, who responded, rendered first aid, took the injured man to the' hotel in Newark, and cared for him until he had recovered. The doctor…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Huddleston v. Texas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hennessy v. Automobile Owners' Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Sabine Motor Co. v. W. C. English Auto Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  3. McCaskill v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. London Assur. Corporation v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Comer v. FarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API