Legal Opinion

Darden v. . Coward

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 10, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The plaintiff sold his 10 shares of stock in the Bank of Ayden long before its insolvency, and the certificate, duly endorsed in blank, was purchased by J. D. McGlohon, cashier and transfer agent of said bank. It is conceded that the failure to transfer the stock on the books of the bank was due to the neglect of the cashier and transfer agent, and not to any fault of the plaintiff. ¥e concur in the judgment of the trial court that, under the facts agreed, the plaintiff is entitled to be relieved of the assessment levied against him as an ostensible stockholder in the Bank of Ayden at the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whitney v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Havens v. Bank of TarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. American Trust Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Carolina Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Oliver v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Corporation Commission of North Carolina v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API