Legal Opinion

State v. Cadwallader

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1900No. 18,795PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Randolph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

The appellee was charged by indictment with having violated the statute defining the crime of embezzlement by bankers and brokers. A trial by jury resulted in his acquittal, and this appeal is prosecuted by the State upon the questions of law reserved by it relative to certain instructions given to the jury by the lower court on its own motion.

•The evidence is not in the record, therefore, if the instructions of which the State complains can be said to be proper, upon any supposable evidence which might have been introduced upon the trial, under the issues ,in the case, this appeal can not be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Meadowcroft v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Martin v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. State v. BeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Squire v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Ward v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Walter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State v. WeltyWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Dedrick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Coddington v. CanadayIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. State v. QuackenbushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API