Legal Opinion

Young v. City of Houston

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided August 11, 1988No. 01-87-00744-CVPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHEN, Justice.

This appeal asserts that it violates the Texas Constitution for a city to use public funds to prosecute violators of private deed restrictions. Finding no unconstitutional expenditure of public funds, we affirm.

The City of Houston, under authority granted by Tex. Local Gov’t Code Ann. §§ 230.001-230.004 (Vernon Pamph.1988), sued appellants to enforce private deed restrictions. The deed restrictions for Larch-mont subdivision stated that “no platted lot shall be used except for residential purposes” and further prohibited “noxious or offensive activity.” In contravention…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. City of TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Bland v. City of TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Brazoria County v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Truong v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  2. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2004
  3. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2007
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1990
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API