Legal Opinion
Marshall v. AT & T MOBILITY
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided June 6, 2011No. 4:10-cr-00699PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RICHARD MARK GERGEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12101. As a result, this matter was referred to a Magistrate Judge for pre-trial proceedings. The Magistrate Judge has made a report and recommendation that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment be granted. Plaintiff has failed to object. After a thorough review of this matter, this Court adopts the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
Analysis
The magistrate judge makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and responsibility for making a final…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rudolph v. Buncombe County GovernmentDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2012
- Alexander v. Pharmerica Logistic Services LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
- Gillaspie v. SpencerDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
- Kumagah v. Aldersgate United Methodist Retirement Community, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022