Legal Opinion

Lake Mabel Development Corp. v. Bird

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mathews, Commissioner:

On petition for rehearing of Lake Mabel Development Corporation v. H. W. Bird, substituted for W. H. Marshall, 99 Fla. 253, 126 So. R. 356, it is suggested this Court in sustaining the court below in striking the plea incorporated in the amended answer of the defendant, overlooked the statute which provides that the defendant may, in all cases, instead of filing a formal plea or demurrer, insist on any special matter in his answer, and have the same benefit thereof as if he had pleaded the same matter or had demurred to the bill, Section 4913, Comp. Gen. Laws of Florida…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lake Mabel Development Corp. v. BirdSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Burr v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  3. Burroughs Land Co. v. MurphyMississippi Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Cheaney v. Fort Lauderdale Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flowers v. SchenckSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Flowers v. SchenckSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API