Legal Opinion · Dissent

Flowers v. Schenck

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 17, 1933Published

1Dissent

Arthur Schenck as Receiver of the Bank of Wauchula exhibited its bill in the Circuit Court for Hardee County to enforce a mortgage lien upon certain lands in that county against Mary Flowers, a widow, and William Leonard Flowers.

The debt to secure which the mortgage was executed was evidenced by a promissory note signed by Mary, William, and Ed Flowers in the sum of twelve hundred and fifty dollars. The mortgage was also signed by them. Mary was the wife of Ed Flowers, who died before this suit was commenced. The note was dated November 23, 1927, payable ninety days after date to The Bank of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  2. Trower v. BernardSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  3. Cheaney v. Fort Lauderdale Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1928
  4. Lake Mabel Development Corp. v. BirdSupreme Court of Florida · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API