Legal Opinion

Latham v. Bausman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment on the pleadings, entered in the district court for Hennepin county, pursuant to order of Lochren, J.

1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.

Appeal from a judgment ordered for plaintiff on the pleadings. The complaint was for the price of a gas-engine, alleged to have been sold by plaintiff to defendant, the latter to take it upon 30 days’ trial, and, if found as represented, defendant to pay plaintiff the price of $500, less 5 per cent., in cash, or one-fourth of the price in cash, the other three-fourths to be secured by three equal promissory notes at two, four, and six months, respectively. On such a sale the purchaser would have to determine whether the engine was as represented, and, if not as represented, to so notify…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Russell & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1901
  2. J. C. Boss Engineering Co. v. Gunderson Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Rennix v. HardmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API