Legal Opinion
Cardinal Health 200, LLC v. Cellex, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 22, 2025No. 2:24-cv-03901Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CARDINAL HEALTH 200, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action 2:24-cv-3901 Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. Magistrate Judge Jolson CELLEX, INC., Defendant. OPINION & ORDER Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions (Doc. 30) and Defendant’s Motion to Compel (Doc. 38) are before the Court. For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED, and Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED without prejudice in part. The Court also LIFTS the stay of the discovery and dispositive motion deadlines and SETS new case deadlines.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sharon Surles, by Next Friend Jayneice Johnson, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Adkins v. WoleverCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Gruenbaum v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
- Beaven v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- John B. v. GoetzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.