Legal Opinion

Montagnese v. Spicer

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 19, 2011No. AC 32277PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The plaintiff, John R. Montagnese, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion for contempt brought by the defendant, Patricia A. Spicer, for the plaintiffs failure to make timely payments to her pursuant to a stipulated judgment. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly held him in contempt. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

*303The record reveals the following facts and procedural history that are relevant to this appeal. The plaintiff and the defendant resided together at a property owned by the plaintiff located at 117 West Hill Road in Stamford. On…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Papa v. New Haven Federation of TeachersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Stechel v. FosterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. Traylor v. STATE SUPERIOR COURTConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  4. Kravetz v. KravetzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pease v. Charlotte Hungerford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  2. Kasowitz v. KasowitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API