Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lee v. Loftin

Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)

Decided March 3, 2009No. 12-07-00143-CVPublished

1Concurrence

BRIAN HOYLE, Justice.

Because the summary judgment proof raises a fact issue as to whether the exception to the limitation on liability contained in section 87.004(2) applies, I agree that the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Loftin should be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings. Because the summary judgment proof fails to raise a fact issue as to whether the limitation on liability contained in section 87.003 applies, I concur in the court’s judgment by separate opinion.

Limitation on Liability

In construing a statute, our primary objective is to determine and give…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. City of BoerneTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Laidlaw Waste Systems (Dallas), Inc. v. City of WilmerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Acker v. Texas Water CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. McIntyre v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. DownsTexas Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API