State v. McLaughlin
Supreme Court of Missouri
Error to St. Louis Circuit Court. cited 14 Johns. 294 ; 18 Mo. 321; 22 Conn. 156; 17 Wend. 460; 1 Hill, 94; 5 Gilm. 305 ; 1 Hawk P. C. 33 ; 7 M. & W. 623 ; 1 Hale, 506.
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, Judge
It , is sufficient to say, without analyzing the instructions that were given, that they presented the law of the case fairly to the jury, .and on the hypothesis that the defendant found the pocket-book the law was stated in conformity to the opinion of this court in the case of the State v. Conway, 18 Mo. 321. The instructions asked by the defendant were properly - refused because the principle contained in the first was covered by one already given, and the second was wrong because it assumed that larceny can only exist where the property stolen is taken from the possession of the owner,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- State v. ConwaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. McGeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- State v. WelsorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- State v. MusickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- State v. RaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- State v. ChurchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.