Legal Opinion

Kowal Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1961No. Appeal, No. 301PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ebvin, J.,

In this unemployment compensation case the appellant was refused benefits by the bureau, the referee and the board under the provisions of §402 (b)(1) of the Law, 43 PS §802(b) (1).

Appellant was last employed by the Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation and he voluntarily terminated his employment in order to explore a job opportunity in California. At the time he severed the employment relationship he had no definite contract of hire with the prospective employer. He testified as follows: “Q. We are not concerned at the moment with why you applied for it. You say you had a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Disario Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Naugle Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burke v. Board of ReviewAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  2. Eckenrod v. Unempl. Comp. Bd. of Rev.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API