Legal Opinion

Vellum v. Demerle

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Erie county court. Action by John Vellum against Charles Demerle, impleaded, etc., to foreclose a mortgage. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage upon real estate. The premises mortgaged were conveyed to the defendant, Charles Demerle, and Mary E. Demerle, in 1874. They were at the time of the conveyance to them husband and wife, but no mention of that fact was made in the deed to them. On the 4th day of June, 1879, Mr. Demerle executed and delivered to Jacob Wolfe a quitclaim deed of the premises in question, and on the same day Wolfe and his wife conveyed the premises by a quitclaim deed to Mary E. Demerle. These deeds were duly recorded. The record title to the mortgaged premises remained in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Storrs v. BarkerNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
  2. Wood v. . SeelyNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  3. Tilton v. NelsonNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Erie County Savings Bank v. . RoopNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Lee v. PorterNew York Court of Chancery · 1821

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Diamond v. WassermanNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Walnut Hill Bank v. National Reserve BankAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912
  3. Pelanne v. SechestowerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API