Legal Opinion
Hooker v. City of Toledo
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 3, 2015No. Case No. 3:14CV1131Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES G. CARR, Senior District Judge.
This is an employment discrimination case. Plaintiff James Hooker alleges that the defendant, the City of Toledo, violated Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. He claims that the City fired .him because he is African-American and in retaliation for his filing of a complaint with the Ohio Commission on Civil Rights and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, alleging the City had not treated him equally with regard to promotion.
Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1381.
Pending is defendant’s motion for summary…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jett v. Dallas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.