Legal Opinion
Kelsey v. Mackay
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 14, 1911No. 9469PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurs-ton county, Mitchell, J., entered October 31, 1910, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
— On November 30, 1909, the defendant Gordon Mackay, an attorney at law, as party of the first part, and the plaintiff, Tracey Kelsey, as party of the second part, entered into a written contract, material portions of which read as follows:
“Party of the first part agrees to carry out a contest against W. Thomas Edwards, who has filed a homestead entry on the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter and the north half of the southeast quarter and the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter, all in section 20, township. 21, N., R. 9, W. W. M., Chehalis county, Washington, the said…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Allen v. HammondSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Edwards v. Trinity & Brazos Valley Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Fritzler v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Nordyke & Marmon Co. v. KehlorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Duncan v. New York Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thiel v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Chas. F. Noble Oil & Gas Co. v. GistCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925