Weymers v. Weymers
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
The interest which the Commonwealth has in the marriage relation and its continuance is sufficient warrant for a judge, before whom a proceeding in divorce is pending, to bring upon the record any facts within his knowledge bearing upon the lack of legal justification for such divorce. The libellant and respondent are not the only parties concerned. The State is likewise an interested party, (19 C. J. 19; 9 R. C. L. 253), and has a right to have all the relevant facts involved in the case placed in the record, whether offered in evidence by the parties or not. But such…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hahn v. BealorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Fisher v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
- Carey v. CareySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Schreckengost's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Bauder's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wald v. WaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
- Philadelphia Labor's Non-Partisan League Club's Application for Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Hilyard v. HilyardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Patanyi v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Bolivar Borough AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.