Legal Opinion

State v. Mazur

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 2018No. COA17-736PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INMAN, Judge.

Michael Stanley Mazur and Anne-Marie Mazur1 (collectively "Defendants") appeal from judgments following jury convictions for felony stalking. Defendants argue that the trial court erred by denying their motions to dismiss for insufficient evidence, and that the felony stalking statute, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-277.3A, is unconstitutional as applied to their actions because they were engaged in protected expression under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

This appeal arises from the culmination of vindictive neighborly behavior that spiraled out of control-beyond…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  3. United States v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. FritschSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MylettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. State v. MylettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API