Legal Opinion

Lozoya v. National Mobility Eldercare Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided August 15, 2023No. 2:22-cv-00065Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Clayda L Lozoya, No. CV-22-00065-PHX-DLR 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 National Mobility Eldercare Incorporated, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 At issue is Defendant National Mobility Eldercare Incorporated’s (“National 17 Mobility”) motion to dismiss (Doc. 25) Plaintiff Clayda Lozoya’s amended complaint 18 (Doc. 22), which is fully briefed (Docs. 29, 30). National Mobility’s motion is denied. 19 I. Legal Standard 20 The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require a pleading to contain “a short and plain 21 statement of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Cousins v. LockyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Allen v. Pacific BellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API