Legal Opinion

White v. White

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 18, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Memorandum.—Suit for separate maintenance. Appeal from an order for temporary alimony entered by the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, A. D. 1892, and affirmed.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court,

Gary, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order for temporary alimony, on a bill for separate maintenance.

The only complaint is as to the amount, and as that was awarded upon a master’s report to which no objections were made below, the amount can not be questioned here. Huling v. Farwell, 33 Ill. App. 238, which, though reversed by the Supreme Court, (Farwell v. Huling, 132 Ill. 112,) was there affirmed on this point. If the appellee has a home well furnished, she may still claim temporary alimony. She is not required to exhaust her own resources first. The authority of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harding v. HardingIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Farwell v. HulingIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Huling v. FarwellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889
  4. Harding v. HardingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Farrar v. FarrarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API