Legal Opinion
Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Certain Underwriters
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided March 23, 1992No. 92-C-0076-CPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CRABB, Chief Judge.
This petition to compel arbitration is before the court on respondents’ second notice of removal. Petitioner opposes the removal, contending that respondents should not be permitted to remove on a ground that could have been presented in the first removal petition they filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b) and because all of the respondents have not joined in the removal petition. Respondents assert that 9 U.S.C. § 205 entitles them to remove the action at “any time” and does not require all respondents to join in the petition for removal.
I conclude that 9…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Arizona v. ManypennySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Northern Illinois Gas Company, an Illinois Corporation v. Airco Industrial Gases, a Division of Airco, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Ramiro Arango and Gabriella Arango, Individually, Etc., Plaintiffs v. Guzman Travel Advisors Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- S.W.S. Erectors, Inc. v. Infax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- In the Matter of Amoco Petroleum Additives Company and Buck Isbell, in the Matter of Robin A.G. Jackson, an Underwriter at Lloyd's, LondonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- DIAL 800 v. FesbinderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Production Stamping Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993
- Spillers v. TillmanDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.