Legal Opinion

Bernie Moore v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 18, 1972No. 72-1190PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Per curiam

Moore appeals from a district court order dismissing his application for section 2255 relief. Moore claimed that his 1968 guilty plea to a violation of 18 U. S.C. § 2113(a) should be set aside because he was mentally incompetent when his plea was taken.

The district court dismissed the application for two reasons: (1) Moore waived his claim for relief on the ground here asserted because he had not presented the claim on an earlier section 2255 petition; and (2) Moore’s “mental competence was the subject of psychiatric investigation, a hearing, and judicial determination before his plea was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gerald L. Stone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  4. Carl Jess Hanson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  5. Billy Ray Brewster v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Larry David Davis v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API