Morgan v. Morgan
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
The plaintiff brought her action in divorce on the grounds of indignities and cruel and barbarous treatment. On January 8, 1955 the court appointed a master. Following the appearance of Hyman Schwartz, Esq., for the husband on January 19, 1955, the record discloses 30 docket entries, in all, which evidence not only diligence of plaintiff’s counsel but also the extent of the defensive measures interposed by the defendant. In response to his rule the wife filed a bill of particulars voluminous in scope, setting forth her specific complaints. There were rules for amendment of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Breinig v. BreinigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
- Rothman v. RothmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Bowen v. BowenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
3Cited by8 opinions
- Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Oswald v. OswaldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Cox v. CoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Campana v. CampanaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Coleman v. ColemanAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.