People v. Silverstein
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The orders of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendants argue that the nighttime search was invalid under CPL 690.35 (3) and 690.45 (6) and, therefore, that the fruits thereof should have been suppressed. We disagree. The warrant itself expressly authorized the nighttime entry, it was not signed until after 9:00 p.m., and it directed the police to make an immediate search; additionally, an immediate search was reasonably necessary because the whereabouts of the violent-crime suspects were still unknown, the potential loss of evidence was a real…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. McRayNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. ArnauNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. RoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. RichardsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. HaywardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. SherwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. FergusonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.