Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Frazier

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 7, 1984No. 94, 95, 96 & 124 September Term, 1982Published

1DissentDavidson, Judge

I

Introduction

The majority here determines that the five defendants in the four criminal cases decided in this appeal did not demonstrate that there was either an “abuse of discretion or a lack of good cause as a matter of law” when their respective cases were postponed and rescheduled for trial on dates beyond the 180-day period prescribed by Maryland Code (1957, 1982 Repl.Vol., 1983 Cum.Supp.), Art. 27, § 591,1 and *465Maryland Rule 746.2 Consequently, the majority holds that the motions to dismiss in each of the four cases should have been denied. I do not agree. Accordingly, I respectfully…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  5. State v. PachayOhio Supreme Court · 1980

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API