Legal Opinion

Grossman v. Calonia Land & Improvement Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 18, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by^

Parker, J.

The suit is to recover the sum of.$6,000 and interest claimed by the plaintiff, a loan broker, as agreed compensation for negotiating a mortgage loan of $70,000 on property1- of the defendant corporation, pursuant to a written paper signed and delivered by defendant. One of the defenses was that the contract, if any, was illegal and void as providing for a rate of brocage in excess of that permitted by the fifth section of the statute entitled “An act against usury” (Comp. Slat., p. 5706), which prescribes a penalty for “taking or receiving”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. President of Springfield Bank v. MerrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
  2. Goward v. WatersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Lapham v. FlintSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  4. Mooney v. Daily News Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. Schoenmann v. WhittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ellison v. Evergreen CemeteryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  2. Fitzsimons v. Eagle Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  3. Ass'n Group Life, Inc. v. Catholic War VeteransNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  4. Marano v. SabbioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  5. Barton v. MarlowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API