Legal Opinion

Dey v. Coughlin

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided May 22, 2020No. 4:19-cv-00318Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION JUDY DEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 19-00318-CV-W-ODS ) BETTE COUGHLIN, ) individually and as Executor of the ) Estate of Patrick Michael Hennessey, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT Pending is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Doc. #63. For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. I. BACKGROUND1 In January 2016, Defendant Bette Coughlin…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Wierman v. Casey's General StoresCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. Williams v. City of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  5. Jones v. HansenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API