Legal Opinion

Friedmann v. Franklin Pierce Public Schools

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 30, 2024No. 3:22-cv-06010Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 MICHAEL FRIEDMANN, CASE NO. 3:22-cv-06010-LK 11 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING CROSS 12 v. MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING MOTIONS 13 FRANKLIN PIERCE PUBLIC SCHOOLS, TO STRIKE AND FOR et al., SANCTIONS 14 Defendants. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ cross motions and supplemental cross 17 motions for summary judgment. Dkt. Nos. 32–33, 48–49. Plaintiff Michael Friedmann, who 18 worked as a substitute teacher for Franklin Pierce Public Schools, contends that the school district…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API