Legal Opinion
State v. Osbourne
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 21, 1936PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
In this case there are but two assignments of error. Both of them challenge the validity of the amendment to section 11, Article I of the Constitution of the state of Oregon, which was adopted by the people at the state-wide election held May 18, 1934. This amendment is as follows:
“* * * provided, however, that in the circuit court ten members of the jury may render a verdict of guilty or not guilty, save and except a verdict of guilty of first degree murder, which shall be found only by a unanimous verdict, and not otherwise; * * Oregon Laws 1935, p. 5.
The first assignment of error presents…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Maxwell v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Schumacher v. ByrneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by14 opinions
- Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Railroad Commission v. Sterling Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Ramon Antonio Fournier v. Balbino Gonzalez, Warden of the District Jail of San JuanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.