Legal Opinion
Glynn v. Edo Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 27, 2008No. Civil JFM 07-1660PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff Dennis Glynn (“Glynn”) has filed this suit against defendants EDO Corporation (“EDO”), Impact Science and Technology, Incorporated (“1ST”), Michael Caprario (“Caprario”), and Dean Puzzo (“Puzzo”), alleging retaliation in violation of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730 et seq., and wrongful discharge in violation of public policy under New Hampshire and Maryland common law. Glynn seeks reinstatement, economic damages, compensatory damages, non-economic emotional distress damages, punitive damages, costs, fees, attorneys’ fees,…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lawson v. Fmr Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Mann v. Heckler & Koch Defense, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
- Glynn v. Edo Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Boone v. Mountainmade FoundationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Glynn v. IMPACT SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, INC.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.