Legal Opinion

Jensma v. Allen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 5, 1957No. 49053PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Plaintiff, Jensma, was a crop tenant on “the cropland” of defendant’s quarter section. Both were farmers and lived a mile apart. Under their lease they were to share the crop “on a 50-50” basis. Many of its provisions are not pertinent here. Near its end however was a paragraph with which we shall have some concern:

“The stock fields shall belong to the landlord, and if there is an undue amount of corn remaining in the cornfield after picking, the tenant agrees to pick the same and divide equally with the landlord.”

Plaintiff testifies that the term “stock fields” means “all the acres that was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hull v. Bishop-Stoddard CafeteriaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Clark v. StrohbeenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. Melsha v. Tribune Pub. Co. of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  4. Goldstein v. MundonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  5. Brown v. Dubuque Altar Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co. v. RoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  2. Tice v. Wilmington Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  3. Zeman v. Canton State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  4. Sandhorst v. Mauk's Transfer, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  5. Welke v. City of DevenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API