Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Mundon

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 19, 1926PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Evans, J.-

The farm in question consists of 324 acres, upon which the plaintiff held a second mortgage for $5,800. The mortgagor and owner of the farm was the defendant Nathan E. Mundon. The plaintiff obtained a decree of foreclosure in September, 1922, and caused execution sale to be made. Pursuant thereto, he obtained a sheriff’s deed on October 1, 1923. The claim now pressed by him is for the alleged landlord’s share of the certain unharvested corn standing upon the farm on the date of his acquisition of title. F. E. Mundon is the son of Nathan E. Mundon. Nathan purchased this farm from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. StrohbeenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  2. Everingham v. BradenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  3. Adams v. Beadle & SleeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  4. Richards v. KnightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  5. Frum v. KuenySupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Keokuk Trust Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  2. Jensma v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  3. First Trust Joint Stock Land Bank v. OgleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  5. Durflinger v. HeatonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API