Legal Opinion

Asbury v. Ralph M. Parsons Company

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 17, 1968No. 1 CA-IC 161PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Judge.

The issues presented are in part procedural and in part in relation to whether the evidence reasonably supports the Award denying a finding of permanent physical injury.

PROCEDURE

The Court has this day decided the case of Soto v. City of Tucson, 8 Ariz.App. 199, 445 P.2d 82 (Industrial Commission). In Soto we considered a problem which is also presented in the matter now under consideration, that is, the propriety of combining a petition for hearing after an Award with a petition to reopen. In commenting on this dual approach, in Soto we stated that this procedure “ * * *…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Laird v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  2. Davis v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Soto v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lugar v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  2. Soto v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. McKnight v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Mokma v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. Asbury v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API