Asbury v. Ralph M. Parsons Company
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
STEVENS, Judge.
The issues presented are in part procedural and in part in relation to whether the evidence reasonably supports the Award denying a finding of permanent physical injury.
PROCEDURE
The Court has this day decided the case of Soto v. City of Tucson, 8 Ariz.App. 199, 445 P.2d 82 (Industrial Commission). In Soto we considered a problem which is also presented in the matter now under consideration, that is, the propriety of combining a petition for hearing after an Award with a petition to reopen. In commenting on this dual approach, in Soto we stated that this procedure “ * * *…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Laird v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Davis v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Soto v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lugar v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Soto v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- McKnight v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Mokma v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Asbury v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971