Legal Opinion

McKnight v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 20, 1969No. 1 CA-IC 217PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOFRIO, Chief Judge.

The issues raised by the petitioner are procedural in nature. The first two questions deal with issues which were discussed by this Court in the case of Soto v. City of Tucson, 8 Ariz.App. 199, 445 P.2d 82 (1968), in Asbury v. Ralph M. Parsons Co., 8 Ariz.App. 203, 445 P.2d 86 (1968), and in Lugar v. Industrial Commission, 9 Ariz.App. 44, 449 P.2d 61, decided December 30, 1968. In Lugar we quoted from Parsons v. Industrial Commission, 98 Ariz. 74, 402 P.2d 20 (1965). Soto and Asbury were decided after the briefs in the instant case had been filed.

The petitioner’s first…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  2. Lugar v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. Parsons v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Edwards v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Morris v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harding v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  2. Higgins v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. McDuffee v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API