Legal Opinion
Pitman v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided January 9, 1926No. A-5180PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
From a conviction in the county court of Muskogee county, the plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, have appealed.
Briefly stated the evidence shows the following state of facts: That on the date charged certain officers, after waiting throughout the night, about daylight, discovered the defendants in the woods about 9 miles from Haskell. Upon being approached the defendant Pitman ran and made his escape. The defendant Osborne was apprehended. H,e had at the time a 5-gallon jug of whisky, which he had just set down. At the request of the officers, he conducted them to a still…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kirk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
- Abbott v. TerritorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Nelson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Pickrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Whitlow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Black v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Wise v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
- Andres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
- Tolbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.