Legal Opinion

Thaddeus Donald Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 23, 1989No. 87-4804PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:

The issue is whether the guarantee of equal protection of the laws forbids the exercise of peremptory challenges on racial grounds by a private litigant in the trial of a civil case in federal district court. We hold that it does, thus extending the principle announced by the Supreme Court in Batson v. Kentucky.1

I

Injured in an accident on a construction job at Fort Polk, Louisiana, a federal enclave, Thaddeus Donald Edmonson, a 34-year-old black male, sued Leesville Con*1310Crete Company for negligence in federal district court.2 The case was tried to a jury.

Edmonson…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Alex v. Rayne Concrete ServiceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  3. Lemley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  4. Thomas v. Diversified Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Thaddeus Donald Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API