Legal Opinion

Thaddeus Donald Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 22, 1990No. 87-4804PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEE, Circuit Judge:

Today we decide whether a private litigant in a federal civil case who challenges a venire member peremptorily can be made to give reasons for his action. Specifically, *219we must determine whether he can be required to do so when his opposing party is a black person and the venireman stricken is black, so as to rebut the inference that he exercised the strike because of the would-be juror’s ethnic group.

The Supreme Court has imposed such a requirement in criminal prosecutions of black defendants, Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986); and in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Munn v. AlgeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. Alex v. Rayne Concrete ServiceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  4. Lemley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  5. James Dawson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API