Legal Opinion
Rosenbrahn v. Daugaard
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided January 12, 2015No. 4:14-CV-04081-KESPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KAREN E. SCHREIER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Jennie and Nancy Rosen-brahn, Jeremy Coller and Clay Schweitzer, Lynn and Monica Serling-Swank, Krystal Cosby and Kaitlynn Hoerner, Barbara and Ashley Wright, and Greg Kniffen and Mark Church, brought this action against defendants Dennis Daugaard, Marty Jack-ley, Doneen Hollingsworth, Trevor Jones, and Carol Sherman in their official capacities, alleging that South Dakota’s marriage laws violate the United States Constitution. Plaintiffs move…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Waters v. RickettsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2015
- Dukhan Mumin v. Douglas D. Grieser, Donald L. Knowles, John Friend, Donald Kleine, Crystal Rhoades, Douglas County Nebraska, Lancaster County Nebraska, and State of NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2025
- SD VOICE v. NoemDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2021