Legal Opinion
Shaker Parkway Co. v. Porter
Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided November 4, 1946No. Nos. 283-288PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGRUDER, Judge.
These complaints, consolidated for hearing, raise the common question as to the validity of a provision of the Rent Regulation for Housing forbidding landlords of priority-constructed housing from exacting or retaining security deposits in connection with the rental of such housing accommodations.
Complainants are severally the owners and landlords of priority-constructed housing in various defense-rental areas. The accommodations in question were first rented after the applicable freeze date, and the respective maximum rents were established under § 4(f) of the Rent Regulation…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Taylor v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Brown v. Bayview Manor Homes, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1943
- Bowles v. Sylbern Homes of Connecticut, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1944
3Cited by3 opinions
- Block v. GatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Supak v. PorterEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
- Woods v. William A. White & SonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949