Legal Opinion
Supak v. Porter
Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided December 2, 1946No. Nos. 246, 257PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, Judge.
These two consolidated causes present an issue as to the validity of Section 13(a) of Revised Maximum Price Regulation No. 287 (8 F.R. 9122) issued and effective June 29, 1943. The first is a proceeding under Section 204(e) (1) of the Emergency Price Control Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 924(e) (1), and the second a complaint to review the denial-of a protest under Section 204(a). So far as our disposition is concerned, the issue is the same in each case.
Complainants are manufacturers of women’s slacks and slack suits. During the period in question, June 29, 1943 to May 1, 1944,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Earl C. Gibbs, Inc. v. Defense Supplies CorporationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
- Consolidated Water Power & Paper Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
- Hawaii Brewing Corp. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
- Pfeiffer Brewing Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kershaw v. KendallEmergency Court of Appeals · 1954
- Tanners Hides Inc. Of Texas v. Charles H. Kendall, Assistant Director, Office of Defense MobilizationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1955
- Gilbert C. Kershaw, William N. Stobo, George E. Phelps, Frank L. Laffee, Emmons K. Berry, Paul W. Swift, George W. Thompson, Bonnie W. Bacon, David B. Barker, Eugene L. Lounsbury, Stanley J. Kowalczyk, Albert G. Kenney and Nildo B. Sartori v. Charles H. Kendall, Assistant Director, Office of Defense Mobilization. Hubert B. Klosterman, Roy S. MacDougal Leslie R. Ladd, Floyd H. Bennett, John Marshak, Everett H. Pert, and A. Clayton Longfellow v. Charles H. Kendall, Assistant Director, Office of Defense MobilizationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1954