State Ex Rel. Kiser, Cohn & Shumaker, Inc. v. Sammons
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRichman, J.
Upon relator’s verified petition we ordered that respondents show cause why a writ of prohibition should not issue. The controversy is between relator and respondent James T. Vie whose answer is argumentative. It is verified by his attorney, Jay E. Darlington, who is referred to hereinafter as Vie’s attorney. Searching through the answer we find that the material averments of relator’s petition are either admitted or not denied.
Several years ago in a receivership cause pending in the Lake Circuit Court, James Dexter filed a petition asking for relief against the relator herein. In his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Board of Commissioners v. GwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Shoultz v. McPheetersIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Indianapolis Life Insurance v. LundquistIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
- State ex rel. Cook v. Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Harp v. Vanderburgh Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
- Ex Parte LoweryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Zilky v. Lake Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1961
- Ex Parte LoweryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975