Legal Opinion

Tait v. Hall

California Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1886No. 11259PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts-are-stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

This is an action to restrain the defendant, as road overseer of Tehama road district, in the county of Tehama, from opening a road for public use across the land of plaintiff.

The cause was tried by the court without a jury; written findings were filed, upon which a decree was entered in favor of the plaintiff, perpetually enjoining the defendant from entering upon, laying out, constructing, opening, or keeping open a road for public use through the land of the plaintiff, which is properly described.

From this decree, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harding & Loftin v. JasperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cross v. AbySupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Smithers v. FitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Lewis v. BurnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Smith v. GlennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API