Tait v. Hall
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts-are-stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This is an action to restrain the defendant, as road overseer of Tehama road district, in the county of Tehama, from opening a road for public use across the land of plaintiff.
The cause was tried by the court without a jury; written findings were filed, upon which a decree was entered in favor of the plaintiff, perpetually enjoining the defendant from entering upon, laying out, constructing, opening, or keeping open a road for public use through the land of the plaintiff, which is properly described.
From this decree, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Harding & Loftin v. JasperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cross v. AbySupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Smithers v. FitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Lewis v. BurnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Smith v. GlennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900