Legal Opinion

Hill v. Bradford

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 22, 1990No. 89-210PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal arises out of a suit to set aside conveyances of real estate that were allegedly made to defraud a judgment creditor. The judgment creditor, Sadie Vess Bradford, is the widow of a crime victim. She received a $225,000 judgment against the defendant/debtor, Dillard Roy Hill, under the Restitution to Victims of Crimes Act, Ala. Code 1975, § 15-18-65 et seq. Mrs. Bradford filed suit to set aside conveyances Hill made to his daughter and to his son's corporation. Hill filed a counterclaim seeking to set aside the restitution judgment entered in Mrs. Bradford's favor. The trial court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  5. Ex Parte WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jolly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  2. Grace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  3. Dixon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  4. McDonald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  5. State v. RedmonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API