Legal Opinion

McDonald v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 10, 1995No. CR-93-1407PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, Judge.

The appellant, Keith 0. McDonald, appeals from the circuit court’s judgment denying his Ala.R.Cr.P. 32 petition in which he contests his 10-year sentence for his conviction of fraudulent use of a credit card pursuant to his guilty plea.

The two claims McDonald asserts in his petition are also asserted on appeal: (1) that he was denied effective assistance of counsel during his sentencing hearing because, he says, counsel failed to object to McDonald’s not being present at the hearing, failed to investigate the importance of his presence, and failed to understand “the judicial…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Magwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  2. Pratt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  3. Jolly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  4. Magwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API