Legal Opinion

Tait v. Reid

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 20, 1913PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Cedar Rapids Superior Court. — Hon. C. B. Robbins, Judge. This action is to recover the possession of land sold under contract, on the ground that the contract has been forfeited by failure to perform its conditions.

1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.

This action was commenced on the 2d day of November, 1910, and is brought to recover the possession of certain real estate in the city of Cedar Rapids, the possession of which defendants claim to hold under and by virtue of a contract of purchase, entered into between them and one H. G. "Webster oh the 10th day of April, 1907.

It appears from the record in this cause: That on the 10th dia,y of April, 1907, H. G. Webster was the owner of the property in "controversy. That he entered into a written contract with the defendants, by the terms of which he undertook and agreed to sell to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davidson v. Hawkeye InsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  2. Dorr v. CorySupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. Dorr v. AlfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Babb's, Inc. v. BabbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. American Falls Reservoir District v. ThrallIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Lane v. Crescent Beach Lodge & Resort, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  4. Ashworth v. HankinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  5. Keokuk State Bank v. EckleyCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API