Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Scott
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided July 31, 2003No. 09-02-069 CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DON BURGESS, Justice.
This appeal involves the settlement of a national consumer class action against Blockbuster, Inc. In an earlier appeal, we determined the trial court did not abuse its discretion in certifying a settlement class in this cause. Peters v. Blockbuster, Inc., 65 S.W.3d 295 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 2001, no pet.). In this second appeal, Denita Sanders, Jamie Johnson, and Leslie Le-Blanc attack the trial court’s final judgment approving the class settlement. We will affirm in part and remand in part.
BACKGROUND
On March 29, 2000, Kim Ann Scott filed this class action lawsuit…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Cotton v. HintonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Briscoe v. Goodmark Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
- General Motors Corp. v. BloyedTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- McAllen Medical Center, Inc. v. CortezTexas Supreme Court · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sanders v. Blockbuster, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004
- Hall v. Pedernales Electric Cooperative, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
- Cohen v. Blockbuster Entertainment, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Cohen v. Blockbuster Entertainment, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Kazman v. Frontier Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.