Eilerman v. Cargill Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants Jay A. Eilerman (“Eilerman”) and Jennifer M. Eilerman (“Mrs.Eilerman”) (collectively “the plaintiffs”) sued Defendant-Appellant Cargill Inc., d/b/a Cargill Oilseed Processing (“Cargill”), for injuries Eilerman sustained while in Cargill’s employ. Eilerman alleged an intentional tort, and Mrs. Eilerman alleged a loss of consortium, with both actions based on Ohio common law. The district court granted summary judgment to Cargill on the intentional-tort claim because the plaintiffs produced insufficient evidence of Cargill’s intent…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mary Elizabeth Leary and Glenda H. Williams v. Stephen DaeschnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Qiusha Ma v. Bon Appetit Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019