Legal Opinion

Eilerman v. Cargill Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 9, 2006No. 05-3950UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Jay A. Eilerman (“Eilerman”) and Jennifer M. Eilerman (“Mrs.Eilerman”) (collectively “the plaintiffs”) sued Defendant-Appellant Cargill Inc., d/b/a Cargill Oilseed Processing (“Cargill”), for injuries Eilerman sustained while in Cargill’s employ. Eilerman alleged an intentional tort, and Mrs. Eilerman alleged a loss of consortium, with both actions based on Ohio common law. The district court granted summary judgment to Cargill on the intentional-tort claim because the plaintiffs produced insufficient evidence of Cargill’s intent…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Mary Elizabeth Leary and Glenda H. Williams v. Stephen DaeschnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Qiusha Ma v. Bon Appetit Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API