Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Marriott International, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 1, 2009No. 4D08-1583PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerber, J.

This appeal presents the question of whether Stockman v. Downs, 573 So.2d 835 (Fla.1991), requires a party to plead entitlement to attorney’s fees incurred during court-ordered, nonbinding arbitration conducted pursuant to section 44.103, Florida Statutes (2004). We answer in the negative and affirm the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees.

In 2004, the plaintiff below filed a negligence action for personal injuries. The trial court ordered the parties to nonbinding arbitration pursuant to section 44.103, which, in 2004, provided in pertinent part:(5) ... An arbitration decision shall be…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stockman v. DownsSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Caufield v. CanteleSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  3. AUTORICO, INC v. Government Employees Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Ganz v. HZJ, INC.Supreme Court of Florida · 1992
  5. Precision Tune Auto Care, Inc. v. RadcliffeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Advanced Chiropractic and Rehabilitation Center, Corp. v. United Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2014
  2. Ocean Bank v. Caribbean Towers Condominium Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Advanced Chiropractic and Rehabilitation Center, Corp. v. United Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API